LILY ANN PRENDERGAST MURDER

 Forty years ago on October 27,1981 a woman named Lily Ann Prendergast's skeletal remains  was found on the side of the interstate in Sacramento California. This cold case is considered to be a homicide by the local police and by the FBI. However, because they cannot seem to find some sort of cause of death or even show an autopsy report I do not believe that this is the case. Even on the skeletal remains they should have been able to find some sort of evidence that would lead them to a homicide, but they have not been able to present such information. Based on the lack of evidence for a homicide I have no choice, but to rule this case out as a death of natural causes. 

Based on the evidence I've seen gathered none of it really points towards an homicide. The FBI report states that she was last seen leaving her parents home after a big argument in Dallas Texas. It's more than likely that this argument must have made her so angry at her parents that she wanted to be away from him as far as possible this worried her parents so much this caused to file a missing persons report. We must also factor in the fact that the body was found on the side of an interstate if this was a homicide why would it be left on the side of the road. If Ms. Prendergast was actually murdered her body wouldn't have left it in such an clear spot.  

The FBI file also tells that she was known for hitch hiking this one fact places her at the scene itself. A logical assumption is that she was out hitch hiking, but due to a terrible accident she soon fell to her injuries and sadly she died. Based on the factors of the landscape it is scientifically proven that it takes only three weeks for a human body to decompose into a skeleton. The local Police themselves believed that Ms. Prendergast met her death five months enough time for the body to decompose into her skeletal remains. 

In Conclusion, based on a lack of evidence and without any kind of leads I have no choice, but to rule this case a death of natural causes. The evidence that has been collected in this report shows that it lines up the assumptions I have made. In this line work we cannot just say that there is someone to blame for a death . This John Henrick saying...............................

CASE CLOSED.

     

 

The Princess Blue Murder

          On September 10, in the year 1990 a man was walking on the side of the road he found human bones with the skull in the tire.  This was Julie Davis or as she is commonly known as Princes Blue. Crimes like these are worst than many if the past crimes I've investigated. Through much research and running through all the possibilities of the case I have come to the conclusion that this crime was caused by her siblings.

            Obviously this was a not a one man job this took multiple people to conduct this crime. Ms. Davis's brother Danny Davis said that their other sister Shelly had met this husband Ms. Davis had married at the age of 18.This one fact is evidence, because of the fact that they were unable to tell the name of this so called "husband" nor could anyone find a second body at the scene. Another interesting thing about the body it takes many years for the human body to decay. The bones were found after three years she disappeared there still should have been some kind of remanence of hair, organs, or even blood  this stands to reason that the body itself was burned to death. When something like hair is burned it will never grow back and when bones are burned they cause fracture patterns.

                  The idea of this crime was to simulate a car accident, however they was no car at the scene. They could concocted the whole thing when in reality they murdered her by burning her alive that made it look like the ribs were fractured. This would be convincing, but they found the skull in a tire then her brother comes along and use his blood to confirm her identity in order to keep him from being a suspect. 

                      In Conclusion, I believe that this murder was initially caused by her siblings. As for the ring this was just to throw everyone off, because Ms. Davis had no connection to Robert E. Lee High. All the stories they made was just a cover story to cover up the fact that committed a murder. This is John Henrick saying........

CASE CLOSED.  

         

                   

               

                     

The Murder of Rochelle Stubblefield

       In recent days a man known as Derron Fuller was accused of killing a 20 year old pregnant woman named Rochelle Stubblefield. While everyone believes that this man killed this woman I say that this accusation is incorrect. I do indeed believe that he this woman, but I'm not convinced that he killed her. Yes it's true that there are testimonies stacked against him, but I don't believe them, for they provided inaccurate details. As what I am I refuse to let this innocent man go to jail for a crime he did not commit. Through much investigation I have come to the conclusion the killer of this crime was Derron Fuller's girlfriend at the time.

             

             In my investigation I saw the truth in the records the police investigated this case for five years and came up with no real evidence. The only thing thing that links Mr. Fuller to this crime is the inaccurate testimonies of three people. He allegedly said he didn't know Ms. Stubblefield and the child she was carrying wasn't his. If what he said was that means he lied Ms. Stubblefield's pregnancy can be traced from eight months ago. The records state that Mr. Fuller was involved with a woman back in 2015 around the same time of the murder.

  

    

                  It's possible that he cheated on his girlfriend and slept with Ms. Stubblefield and by intern accidentally getting her pregnant. The girlfriend found out however, and began to hate Ms. Stubblefield so that she wanted to kill and her unborn child. This gives her a motive wanting to take revenge on both him and Ms. Stublefield at the same time killing her and getting him to take the blame. It's also possible that the two people who said that he confessed to killing Ms. Stubblefield probably was in fact his cousins, but thought was wrong so they helped them. They told the police that the body was buried behind William Elementary School. 

      

              I would believe that except for that one thing they said the body was "behind the William Elementary", School", but when the police searched the whole area they found nothing. It stands to reason that they put the body in a river to let the current drift it away from the area. What they wanted to do was get rid of all real evidence so that all that the police could charge him was their testimonies.

              In conclusion I have come to the single fact that Mr. Fuller's girlfriend is the one that committed this crime. To know the name of this woman ask Mr. Fuller assuming that the police already have the name and refusing to act. While I agree with what he did was wrong he doesn't deserve to go to jail for a crime he didn't committee. This is John Henrick saying..............

CASE CLOSED . 

     

The Death of Alonzo Brooks

       On May 1 in the year 2004 in La Cygne, Kansas a body was found this was the  dead body of Alonzo Brooks. The body was found by his family this shouldn't have happened a family should've ever found a dead body of a family member. It was believed that this crime was a raciest hate crime that there was someone to blame.  I don't believe that this is the case while one would say his friend is to blame would be a good choice I just don't believe this was the case as well. Through much research I have come to the logical conclusion that his death was completely circumstantial.

           It's completely understandable that everyone would think that someone committed this crime that was someone to blame. However if this was the case there would some kind of damage to the body nor was he dragged into the creek. According, to the autopsy the body "did not show any signs of physical injuries, like broken bones, lacerations, or gunshot wounds". This is the biggest piece of evidence proving that no one had something to do with this. I know Dr. Erik was accused of harvesting organs without permission, but the fact of the matter is he would never harvest the organs of a damaged body.  

              Now some people would say that this was all caused by the friend of Mr. Brook's Justin Sprague was really responsible for this whole thing. According, to the record Justin drove him to the party, but left to find some cigarettes' he said that he got "lost" trying to find his way back to the party. I don't believe him how could he get lost if he was able to find his way the first time. It's very possible that when he left and got "lost" Mr. Brooks was left without a way home over the spend of a month as he tried to find his way home he slowly died without food or water. This would explain why none of the items in his pocket was wet they were all dry. 

                In conclusion I believe that the death of Alonzo Brooks was completely circumstantial. I don't believe Justin caused the whole thing, but rather this was the result of his stupidity. As for Dr. Erik I don't believe he had anything to with it either he was just a man who saw opportunity to harvest organs. As I said before if there was someone to blame there would be some kind of damage to the body, but there was nothing. This is John Henrik saying...….

CASE CLOSED. 

     

The Mystery of Room 1046

   Among the many cases, I've investigated so far this one has been most difficult. I speak of the case known as The Mystery of Room 1046 though in my investigation I saw something interesting. The way the man was behaving while staying in the hotel was obvious that he was hiding from someone. This was the result of him doing something in his past of which people wanted revenge. Through much research, I have come to the conclusion that this man was more of the guilty one than the killers, I believe that the killers here were more of the victim.     

         In my research, I learned to ask an interesting question of why would a man go missing, it's because he's done something that would make people so angry that they would go out and kill him. he was has been known by many of my sources that he has gone by many identities the man was later identified as Artemus Ogletree. One of my sources: mentalfloss.com states that a man named Robert Lane drove an unknown young man about half a mile from the hotel in question. This man in question was described to have a deep scratch on his arm. Now Lane suspected that the way the man was trying to cover up the blood from an even worse wound. When Lane asked about the injury on his arm the man was reported to just mumbled: "I'll kill [him] tomorrow". This man had deep injuries and possibly many more along with the desire to kill someone it is likely to believe that this man was one of the people who killed Ogletree.

       

          

          Now it is reasonable to believe that this was not a one-person this murder was carried out by two people. According to mentalfloss.com, they state that on the phone in the room they found fingerprints belonging to a woman. The evidence that was found in the room as well as what we know from the unknown man could greatly mean that this was, in fact, a two-person murder. Which brought me to the logical sequence that the two came in through the back of the hotel tracked him to his room and used one of the employee's master keys to get in the room following their entrance the two and Ogletree began to fight in which the fight ended in his death.

          This sequence is possibly logical it would explain the strange that was seen at the crime scene. According to the site allthatsinteresting.com, it states that after the murder the room was stripped to the barred all clothes, towels, soap, toothpaste, and anything that can be used as a murder weapon. Escaping out the back of the hotel could make for a pretty good getaway after you've just committed a murder. Another interesting piece of evidence from mentalfloss.com during the funeral proceedings an unknown man anonymously funded the funeral. The man called and said that Ogletree had as he put it "jilted" a woman the man apparently knew then send that all three of them met at the hotel. He then finishes the call by saying "Cheaters usually get what's coming to them". The site also says that around the time of the funeral an unknown woman called the local paper saying that Ogletree will be buried at a different location and that all. When the editor asked what happened in the room all she said was "He was in a jam".

         In conclusion, I believe that this was an act of vengeance and that Ogletree was more of the guilty one,and killers were more innocent. All the evidence of this case points in that direction given the description of the unknown man and of the unknown phone calls. It is because of these many reasons why I believe that the names of these two killers are not important. This is John Henrik saying........

CASE CLOSED.

  

Chicago Tylenol Poisening

                   In the city of Chicago in the year of 1982 a horrible massacre occurred it was known as the Chicago Tylenol Poisoning. This massacre was the catalyst to the death of seven people good innocent lives. From what I gather the person who did this didn't have any connections to the victims and even if he did he couldn't account for them getting the poisoned Tylenol. This crime was committed by someone who tried to collect a large some of money. Through my investigation of this crime and with great research I have come to the conclusion that person behind the Chicago Tylenol Poisoning is James Lewis.





                     In my investigation of this case I came across interesting evidence on Lewis of what he did years after the incident. According, abc news go.com it states "After the murders he served 12 years in prison for writing an extortion letter to Johnson and Johnson the markers of Tylenol saying that if they paid 1million dollars they could stop the killing". Evidence like this raises one interesting question.  If he truly was innocent why would he write letter to Johnson & Johnson saying to pay him 1 million dollars to "Stop the killing".



                         As moved through my research I came across an interesting testimony regarding the case. On the site known as Chicago.com a man named August Locallo said "Basically, the FBI had him in custody, and by the time we got to New York, he had his attorney and he wouldn't talk to us". That's another thing that raises a question if  he was an innocent man why would he feel the need to hide behind his attorney.




                              In conclusion I believe that James W. Lewis was the man behind the Chicago Tylenol Poisoning. Why would this man write a letter to the company saying to pay him a million dollars to "Stop the killing". Not too mention, August Locallo firmly believed that Lewis was in fact capable of murder. This is John Henrik saying...............


CASE CLOSED.                         

The Murder of the Elvis Presley Fans'

       On December 28,1956 Barbra and Patricia were leaving to go see an Elvis Presley movie. Though they never returned home. Their mother became worried and called the police which put out a missing persons report. Initially the police had thought that they had planned this whole thing from the start in order to be closer to Elvis. However, things are not how they seem on January 22, 1957 the two sister's frozen remain were found on the side of the road. I have com e to the conclusion that the killer of this crime is Charles Leroy Melquist.



           The person who did this was smart it is a known fact that the two sisters did in fact leave the house to see the movie at 7:30 p.m. . There were also many eye witnesses who saw the girls at the movies. According, to the currenttahs.com the atopsy reports that they died of secondary shock to the low temperatures and they died four hours late that night. It's extremely likely that Melquist offered to give them a ride home, but they stopped threatened to kill them if they didn't take off their clothes then forced them to get out.


             Another interesting piece of evidence I found in my investigation was the murder of Bonnie Leigh Scott. This woman was murdered approximately one year after the murder of the Grim sisters were found. This woman in particular was killed in the same manner as the Grim sisters and died the same. According to the file the man responsible for this crime was Charles Leroy Mequist a crime of which confessed to.


     
      In conclusion, I believe that Charles Leroy Melquist is the killer behind the murder of the Grim sisters. This man confessed to killing a woman in the same manner as the two sisters one year later the murder was also only 10 miles from the Grim sisters. It's very likely that he confessed to throw people of the trail of the Grim sisters murder, for only served 8 years out of 99 years of sentence. This is John Henrik saying............




CASE CLOSED.