The women of Ciudad Juarez

 In year 1993 something began it was a terrible thing this terrible tragedy was nothing short than a massacre. This was known as the Femicides in Ciudad Juárez over 1500 women were ripped from their homes and inured a traumatizing fate, but it didn't stop there. It's unsure how many perhaps even more were killed their bodies mutilated beyond recognition. This is wrong the people who did this not took the lives of these women they also humiliated them tormented them until they reached far pass their breaking point and then even further. I believe that the time has come for justice to bring all of this into the light, after researching this case I have come to the conclusion that this massacre was caried out by the Juarez Cartel or the La Linea. 

This crime was not a personal therefore figuring out this case became highly difficult as this was a professional crime which would no ties and/or leads to follow. The police in the city were far too afraid to help. A mother of one of the victims said that she went to the police and the receptionist did this "didn't even look at the photo. She just said she didn't know anything". This showed that the police were far too consumed in fear to do anything only a powerful cartel would possess the means to in steal that kind of fear. It was the very belief that the police as well as local authorities have been involved in covering up this scandal as this has happened from the 90's into the 2000's and the police has barely left a dent into this entire case.

This particular is known for a great number of crimes such as: Drug trafficking, smuggling, money laundering racketeering, extortion, murder, arms trafficking, bribery, and human trafficking. A cartel that operated in the same area and one of their specialties of crimes was human trafficking the Juarez Cartel fits this profile. In 2015 it was discovered that in 2009 to 2011 twenty-one women were killed and buried an hour away from the city. Now five men were convicted from these murders, the five were said to belonged to the "Aztecas" who were said to be the "foot soldiers" of the powerful cartel the La Linea which was an allies for the Juarez Cartel.

In conclusion it was the Juarez Cartel that caused the kidnapping and death of all of these women. This cartel is the only one that works within the area. This cartel would also possess to make local law enforcement so afraid that they weren't even willing to help out with the investigation. Not too mention, none members were convicted for the crimes which implements the entire cartel itself into this crime. This is John Henrick saying....................................................................

CASE CLOSED.

The Murder of Charles Morgan

 In the 1970's their was a man named Charles Curtis Morgan he was a father, a husband, a successful business man president of his escrow agency, but he was also a man involved in a state land fraud case which involved many crime bosses. As researched through this case I realized that the answer to this case was obvious I soon then realized that it was covered up. His case was originally as suicide I ask of how could his death be a result of suicide when there was in fact no evidence of a suicide. There was gun residue on his left hand yes, but there were also no fingerprints on the gun itself. This man stood up for what was he stood up against injustice in order to protect his family. I believe that this man should be  honored for what he tried to do, I have come to the conclusion that the people responsible for this crime was in fact Bonanno Crime Family.

This case was greatly shrouded in many rumors such as that he was involved in the very same organized crime or that he secretly worked for the U.S. government. Morgan even once claimed that "he has worked as an agent for the federal government and he fought for organized crime. He also claimed that "they" had taken his treasury identification". These reasons as well as many others would give the mafia crime family who believed that many of their activities could likely be exposed, the Bonanno Crime Family had the motives and means to silence him. However, never really said who had kidnapped as he feared for the lives of his family. It was known that the Bonannno Crime Family is in fact  the most violent and brutal mafia crime family. This  known fact can explain Mr. Morgan violent kidnapping as described by his wife he was "missing a shoe, had a plastic handcuff around his ankle, and his hand tied together with a plastic zip tie". This kind of brutality is something to expect from a crime family that is known as the most violent. One of the many crimes this family is known for is illegal narcotics, Mr. Morgan said that during his kidnapping "a hallucinogenic drug had been painted on his on his throat". He went on to claim that drug would either kill him or drive him insane, this would implement the Bonanno Crime Family as they specialize in drug class crimes. 

The crime scene held many strange factors such as "a piece of his own tooth", "a pair of sunglasses that did not belong to him", and a two dollar bills clipped to his underwear along with the same bible scripture told to his wife before he was murdered by a woman she did not know. Along with these things were "several weapons, ammunitions, and CB radio". Many of these things were mixed with others that were mostly likely planted in order to throw everyone off while also making it look like a suicide hence and/or involving the previously stated that gun residue on his left hand. Not too mention this man was shot in the back of his head with a gun that had no fingerprints on it. It's all of these factors that just don't make actually sense which brings me to this question how can someone rule a suicide when there is in fact no evidence?  Later after the murder it was reported that men searched  both his car after it was impounded and his home. The answer to that is simple mobsters like to "clear out" everything that the deceased own in order to make sure certain valuables don't fall into the wrong hands. 

In conclusion, I believe that the Bonanno Crime Family had committed the murder of Charles Morgan. Being  the person who he was the mafia crime family had both the motive and the means to have him killed. The evidence also doesn't even point to even a hint of suicide almost if ruling suicide was ruled without even evidence. Not too mention, Mr. Morgan lived in the same city the crime family operated in. This is John Henrick saying......................................................................

CASE CLOSED. 

 

       

Death in Ice Valley

 In the year of 1970 a badly burnt body was found in a remote part of the Norway's Idalene Valley this was known as the case of the Isdal woman. This was by far a rather difficult case as no one could truly figure who this woman was, it was if all of her actual identity was erased from the face of the earth. As I conducted my research into this case, I became suspinous of many things. Such as who she interacted with and what kind of imprecation she made on people. After much research as well as looking through all possibilities and angles I have come to the conclusion that the Isdal woman was in fact a spy working for the Soviet Union during the Cold War and was killed by an Norigen operative.

While conducting my research I noticed the many ways she interacted with people and what impressions she made on people. One of the people she had an impression on was a 21- year old waitress named Alvhild Ragnes who said "She looked so fashionable-I wished to mimic her style. In fact, I remember her winking at me...from my perspective it felt as though she thought I had been staring too much at her". This quote shows that she makes a very interesting impression on people, she then continues to say "On one occasion while I was serving her, she was in the dining hall sitting right next to-but not interacting with-two German navy personnel one of which was an officer". The only type of people who would have any reason to spy on German officers during this time would be a Russian spy.  

During my investigation I came across the woman's encrypted notepad which I was able to solve. The notepad wasn't a puzzle it was a list of places she had been and how long she stayed there. With this information it was clear that she wasn't hiding from someone of that was true why would she need to take notes about where she went. The places she visited were countries in Europe, during the cold war the main focus of the Soviet Union was to spread the practice of Communism to all countries in places where the USSR had liberated from Nazi control. It was during this time the Soviet Union implemented spies in order to spread the influence of communism or to gain the upper on everyone else. Based on the places she visited it is logical to conclude that she was a Soviet Union spy sent to survey the other countries in Europe in order to see which countries became stronger or which would be able to become a communist country.

The only person who would have any actual motive, to kill a Russian spy would be another spy who works for the Norway government. It was said that the NRK security services were "Interested in reports that the woman had been observing the military test out new rockets in western Norway". Why would someone be interested in the Norway's military rocket test only a Russian spy would be interested in such matters. Not too mention the Soviet Union does have a long extensive history of using female spies in the art of sexpionage.

In conclusion I believe that the Isdal woman was in fact a spy working for the Soviet Union during the Cold War and was killed by an Norigen operative. The Norigen government would be the only one who have the motive and means to kill her. The woman created a list of everywhere she had been, but had an extensive stay in Norway as she was said to have been spying on their military rocket test. This is John Henrick saying.................................................................................

CASE CLOASED.

 

The Trial of Lizzie Borden

 I have investigated many cases for many years,but never have encountered one as gruesome as this. On August 4,1892 at 92 Second Street in Fall River, Massachusetts Andrew Borden and his wife Abby Borden were murdered by an axe that visciously chopped their skulls in multiple pisces. This murder was was puzzling to say the least as police were unable to find any solid evidence. I am here to bring killer to justice for this horrible gruesome act of murder,so that those responsible can know justice. After much extensive research I have come to the logical conclusion that the killer of this crime was Lizzie Borden.

While I investigated this case I discovered that Eli Benece, a clerk at S.R. drug store informed the police that Borden tried to purchase prussic acid (a deadly poison) a day before the murder. This piece of evidence is very interesting. She knew you could easily kill her father and stepmother with this poison,but when she could not she was forced to improvise using the ax. The Boston Daily Globe also reported rumors that ¨Lizzie and her stepmother never got along peacefully and that for a considerable,and for a considerable time back they have not spoken¨. This insight into this case could in fact mean that Lizzie could have in fact harbored anger towards her as well as her father for marrying her giving her a motive. 

Another piece of evidence was that there was no sign of a break in, this means that the murder was done by someone inside the house. Since it was obviously not the maids as they were getting out of bed after the murder. That would only leave one person Lizzie Borden herself, not too mention it´s possible that she cleaned the blood from the area of the murder in order to throw everyone off.  It is also said Lizzie that claimed to be in the barn at the time of the murder there was however no evidence of her ever being there. As there were ¨no footprints on the dusty floor¨, so how could she have been in the barn as there were no footprints? 

In conclusion the murder of this crime was none other than Lizzie Borden. This woman attempted to buy a deadly poison. She also claimed to have alibuy but there was no evidence to support it. While also that during her trial she gave many confused and contradicting answers leading to her many stories to be unbelievable. She also burned her dress that she was wearing of the murder. She claimed that it was cover in ¨old paint¨ if it was covered in old paint why would she wear it at all why not wash it or throw it away rather than burn it. This evidence was enough for her to be indicted into court. This is John Henrick saying……………………………………………..

CASE CLOSED.

  

The Murder of Bob Crane

 On June 29,1978, a man was found in a hotel room in Scottsdale, Arizona a man was found strangled and beaten to death with a blunt object. This man was Robert ¨Bob¨ Crane a popular Hollywood actor who was best known for starring on his hit tv show ¨Hogan's Heroes¨. This murder deemed to be a great tragedy across the nation. During my investigation I discovered many incriminating evidence to bring forth a final conclusion to the case which reveals who committed the crime. After great research of this investigation, I have come to the conclusion that the man responsible for this crime is John Carpenter. 

                While I investigated this murder, I realized that in order to commit this murder this person would have to know exactly where he was on the day in question. The only person who knew where Mr. Crane was in fact John Carpenter. It was also revealed by Mr. Crane´s son, Robert David Crane that on night before the murder Crane and John had an argument at a night club. Robert said ¨They had a breakup of sorts´´ he went on to say ¨Carpenter lost it. He was being rejected; he was being spurned like a lover. There are eyewitnesses that night at a club in Scottsdale that said they had an argument, John and my dad." This argument was possibly a result of Crane´s diminishing relationship causing him to become, so angry that he killed him later in the night. 

 Further evidence shows that in his rental car police found human blood and tissue in his rental car. While the results of which were in fact inconclusive, but for what reason would he have human blood and tissue in his car. This blood and tissue was possibly left in his car when left to destroy the evidence that would prove his guilt of the crime. This is evidence that can prove that this man is the one to cause a questionable scenario that would lead to his innocence. 

In Conclusion, the murderer of this murder was in fact John Carpenter. He is the only person who possesses the means by knowing his exact location. He also had a motive as Crane was going to divorce his latest lover ending the documentation of his love life. Not to mention, what other possible reason could he have for there being human blood and tissue. This is John Henrick saying…………

CASE CLOSED.

The Hall-Mills Murder

 After years of investigating never in my career have, I investigated a case that I found, so heartbreaking. One the morning of September 16,1922 a couple found two people underneath a crabapple tree gruesomely and horribly murdered. The man was Edward Wheeler Hall a local pastor of the St. John's Episcopal Church. He was considered to be the pillar of the community of the town and was married to Mrs. Frances Hall. The woman who laid at his side was Elenor Mills a woman who singed in the church's congregation choir, she was married the church's sexton, Jimmy Mills. The two were involved in a relationship despite the marriages they were committed too. While going against their marriage vows was wrong as they lied and betrayed their wife and husband they did not deserve to die. To find the person or persons who committed this crime was easy to figure out but was hard due to everyone not wanting to choose the obvious answer. However, sometimes the obvious answer is usually the correct answer as all of the evidence and circumstances pointed toward that answer. In the end due to the evidence and given the I am forced to declare that the murderer of this crime was none other than Frances Hall. 

The relationship between Hall and Mills was well known at the time as it was the greatest gossip of the town at the time. This fact alone tells us that this news being gossip Mrs. Hall would have likely one way or another would have heard about it. Another fact about this is that this woman is the only person who could possibly have a motive to kill the two, as she would have harbored anger toward Mr. Hall for betraying her and Mrs. Mills for taking her husband away from her Likewise for Mr. Mills. Next the way they were killed Mrs. Mills in particular, she was "had been shot three times in the head. one of the bullets entered the woman's forehead about two inches above the nose, another ploughed through the right cheek, and the third pierced the right temple. In addition, her throat had been cut so deeply that her jugular vein, windpipe, esophagus, and neck muscles were completely served, and her backbone could easily be seen".  This particular way she was murdered heavily implies that this murder was in fact out of a personal grudge, and Mrs. Halls is the only one who could have a personal grudge against her.  

While investigating I noticed the love letters that the two wrote to each other was also present at the crime scene. These love letters would also be another way that she found out about the relationship, and with those letters she could have devised a plan to commit the murder. However, in order to do this, she would require the letters from both parties to do this. It is highly likely that the other half of the letters from Mr. Jimmy Mills allowing her to devise this plan, this would in fact implement Mr. Mills in the case but given the straightforward wat Mr. Hall was killed it is not likely that he was the one who pulled the trigger. Also, on July 16, 1926, William Randolph Hearst's tabloid revealed shocking new evidence in the case say "HALL'S BRIEBERY REVEALED" and "MRS. HALL'S SPIES HELD TOWN IN TERROR. HOW HIDDEN HAND BALKED HALL MURDER JUSTICE''. This new evidence that was being brought to light reveals that she obviously had behind the scenes in order to turn the case in er favor.

In Conclusion, the murder of this case was in Mrs. Frances Steven Hall. Eventually on January 28, 1926, Mrs. Hall and her two brothers, Willie and Henry left to set sail for Europe. Why they leave so quickly after the murder unless of course they truly had something to hide or leaving was a desperate attempt to cover their tracks. Two days before the murder Ms. Gibson said she once heard "a bitter argument between two men and two women, one with white hair like Mrs. Hall's". She went on to say that she heard a woman yell "Explain these letters "followed by gunshots which was led up by a yell of "Henry". Given the circumstances of this entire case this heated argument was Mrs. Hall confronting the Edward and Ellena resulting in a gun fight. This is John Henrick saying..............................................

CASE CLOSED.

The Murder of Brittany Mcglone

 Over ten years ago a 19-year old  woman name Brittany Mcglone was murdered in the bedroom of her boyfriends home. Many people in her small town said that she was the kindest person they ever met.  Ms.Mcglone was a 19-year high school graduate who decided to take a year off from school,and work two jobs to save some money. After getting off she went to her boyfriend,Jeff Stoges´s home where she decided to take a nap. When her boyfriend returned home she was murdered beaten death by bludgeny,but not just beaten sexually assulted at that. For many years no one has been able to find the killer. This girl´s family cries out for justice while no one has come up with anything. After careful examination of this case and considering the nature of the case I have come to the conclusion that the killer of this crime was Chad Carr.

Obviously,the go-to person to acuss of this crime is her boyfriend himself as she was killed in his home. Not to mention in order to kill her this person would have to know where she was as well as have some sort of connection to her,and have a way of getting into the house itself. However,he as well as all of his family had a solid allibuy as they were either at school,at work,or doing other things. These facts can be proven by many phone calls and camera recordings, because of this, they were cleared as suspects.  Chad Carr however, fits the profile as he was the boyfriend of Jeffś little sister giving her a connection also allowing him to know where the victim was. It is said by many sources that Carr ¨has a lengthy criminal record involving burglary¨,this very fact of knowing that he was experienced in breaking an entry making able to enter the home. 

When the autopsy on the victim's body was conducted it was ruled that she was ultimately killed due to serious head trauma.  As previously mentioned by many sources Carr has a criminal record,but not just in burglary.  His criminal record also included: ¨sexual assult¨ and ¨Assult with a weapon a deadly weapon¨this criminal file alone beens that he would have the necessary experience to take carry out this murder. Also, when the dna report came back they only found the victim´s dna, no one else's they say it was as if they were wrapped in saran wrap. This can only be done by some of experience in ways of sexual assult an area that Carr himself is very experienced in. 

In conclusion the killer of this awful crime is Chad Carr. No matter at what angle someone looks at this case they can see that this was obviously done by someone who had experience in all three things that occurred in this case. Chad Carr has been accused of everything required to carry out this murder,meaning  he has the experience to do everything in this murder. This is John Henrick saying………………………………………………………………………

CASE CLOSED.