The Trial of Lizzie Borden

 I have investigated many cases for many years,but never have encountered one as gruesome as this. On August 4,1892 at 92 Second Street in Fall River, Massachusetts Andrew Borden and his wife Abby Borden were murdered by an axe that visciously chopped their skulls in multiple pisces. This murder was was puzzling to say the least as police were unable to find any solid evidence. I am here to bring killer to justice for this horrible gruesome act of murder,so that those responsible can know justice. After much extensive research I have come to the logical conclusion that the killer of this crime was Lizzie Borden.

While I investigated this case I discovered that Eli Benece, a clerk at S.R. drug store informed the police that Borden tried to purchase prussic acid (a deadly poison) a day before the murder. This piece of evidence is very interesting. She knew you could easily kill her father and stepmother with this poison,but when she could not she was forced to improvise using the ax. The Boston Daily Globe also reported rumors that ¨Lizzie and her stepmother never got along peacefully and that for a considerable,and for a considerable time back they have not spoken¨. This insight into this case could in fact mean that Lizzie could have in fact harbored anger towards her as well as her father for marrying her giving her a motive. 

Another piece of evidence was that there was no sign of a break in, this means that the murder was done by someone inside the house. Since it was obviously not the maids as they were getting out of bed after the murder. That would only leave one person Lizzie Borden herself, not too mention it´s possible that she cleaned the blood from the area of the murder in order to throw everyone off.  It is also said Lizzie that claimed to be in the barn at the time of the murder there was however no evidence of her ever being there. As there were ¨no footprints on the dusty floor¨, so how could she have been in the barn as there were no footprints? 

In conclusion the murder of this crime was none other than Lizzie Borden. This woman attempted to buy a deadly poison. She also claimed to have alibuy but there was no evidence to support it. While also that during her trial she gave many confused and contradicting answers leading to her many stories to be unbelievable. She also burned her dress that she was wearing of the murder. She claimed that it was cover in ¨old paint¨ if it was covered in old paint why would she wear it at all why not wash it or throw it away rather than burn it. This evidence was enough for her to be indicted into court. This is John Henrick saying……………………………………………..

CASE CLOSED.