The Disappearance of Tara Calico

 On September 20th,1988 a young in Valencia County, New Mexico 19-year-old girl named Tara Calico left her home riding her bike. She rode her bike down New Mexico State Road 47 every day, but one day sadly she did not return home. This woman mysteriously disappeared without even a hint of evidence towards her disappearance. Unfortunately, the cause of her disappearance was a matter of kidnapping, her own parents died never knowing where she was. After much research I have come to the ultimate conclusion that the people who kidnapped her were none other than the people the Trafficante crime family. 

This crime family's known territory is "Hillsborough, Tampa Bay, and the state of Florida" the reason this fact is relevant is because the picture of Ms. Calico was found nearly 1500 miles from where she disappeared. The photo was found in a convenience store Port St. Joe Florida this can't be just a coincidence. The photo was found in a state that was completely controlled by an illegal criminal organization. Not to mention the image was not sent it was found meaning there were no actual demands meaning that the image itself is actual proof that she was in fact kidnapped. 

Referring back to my previous statement there weren't actually any demands the photo itself was found not sent. The parents of Ms. Calico never heard any demands from those who kidnapped their daughter, which brings me to another fact. Two of the crimes of the Trafficante crime family is known for is kidnapping and prostitution. The most logical reason why there were no demands is because they wanted to use her as a prostitute. They obviously did not want the victim to be found they wanted her to remain hidden so she could be used along with boy tied right next to him. 

In conclusion, I believe that the Trafficante crime family was responsible for the kidnapping of Tara Calico. The scene of the kidnapping held no evidence which made the police turn on the parents not seeing the bigger picture. Especially along with the evidence previously stated with the evidence that fits in the most logical way. Also, along with the fact that the image was found not far from where she disappeared in a state that was controlled by this organization. This is John Henrick saying...........................................................

CASE CLOSED.

The Phantom Stalker

 On June 8,1989 in the city of Richmond the people were shocked to find a woman lying dead on the ground, this woman's name was Cindy James. She died a very brutal death I could not even begin to understand or even fathom the pain she felt prior to her death. This crime is the most unforgivable I have ever seen this woman was a nurse she taught children she did not have the fate that life gave her. I refuse to stand and let the man who committed this brutal terrible get away with this. After researching this case I have come to the conclusion that the killer of this terrible crime is Pat Mcbride. 

In this particular case the person to search for would in fact be her ex-husband it is the simplest answer. However, that is not the case here Pat Mcbride was not just a lover of Ms. James he was also a police officer. Ms. James received many threatening phone calls and many other verbal and physical abuse in which the police hardly did anything to help. Mcbride who was a police officer would have known how the police would be able to react and therefore manipulate the outcome of the entire situation. This would explain why the police were so reluctant to help forcing her to turn to a private investigator. Also, when the police put her house under surveillance the attacker only attacked when the police took their gaze off of her that means that person would have to know when the police would only someone from within would know information like that.  

In order to pull off these crimes the killer would have to be very close to like someone who was close to her someone who knows the layout of the house itself. Furthermore, the way the police handle the murder itself was questionable at the most. They ruled it as a suicide, but how could it be a suicide if her arms and legs were tied behind her back. The most logical reason for hardly putting any effort into the case is because they did not want to arrest one of their own. 

In conclusion, I believe that Pat Mcbride is responsible for the murder of Cindy James. The police hardly put any effort in this case for the logical reason that they didn't want to arrest their own. It couldn't have been her husband, for received the same threatening phone calls she did. Mcbride fits the profile and would have all of the nessciary information required to carry out the murder. This is John Henrick saying.........................................

CASE CLOSED.

The women of Ciudad Juarez

 In year 1993 something began it was a terrible thing this terrible tragedy was nothing short than a massacre. This was known as the Femicides in Ciudad Juárez over 1500 women were ripped from their homes and inured a traumatizing fate, but it didn't stop there. It's unsure how many perhaps even more were killed their bodies mutilated beyond recognition. This is wrong the people who did this not took the lives of these women they also humiliated them tormented them until they reached far pass their breaking point and then even further. I believe that the time has come for justice to bring all of this into the light, after researching this case I have come to the conclusion that this massacre was caried out by the Juarez Cartel or the La Linea. 

This crime was not a personal therefore figuring out this case became highly difficult as this was a professional crime which would no ties and/or leads to follow. The police in the city were far too afraid to help. A mother of one of the victims said that she went to the police and the receptionist did this "didn't even look at the photo. She just said she didn't know anything". This showed that the police were far too consumed in fear to do anything only a powerful cartel would possess the means to in steal that kind of fear. It was the very belief that the police as well as local authorities have been involved in covering up this scandal as this has happened from the 90's into the 2000's and the police has barely left a dent into this entire case.

This particular is known for a great number of crimes such as: Drug trafficking, smuggling, money laundering racketeering, extortion, murder, arms trafficking, bribery, and human trafficking. A cartel that operated in the same area and one of their specialties of crimes was human trafficking the Juarez Cartel fits this profile. In 2015 it was discovered that in 2009 to 2011 twenty-one women were killed and buried an hour away from the city. Now five men were convicted from these murders, the five were said to belonged to the "Aztecas" who were said to be the "foot soldiers" of the powerful cartel the La Linea which was an allies for the Juarez Cartel.

In conclusion it was the Juarez Cartel that caused the kidnapping and death of all of these women. This cartel is the only one that works within the area. This cartel would also possess to make local law enforcement so afraid that they weren't even willing to help out with the investigation. Not too mention, none members were convicted for the crimes which implements the entire cartel itself into this crime. This is John Henrick saying....................................................................

CASE CLOSED.

The Murder of Charles Morgan

 In the 1970's their was a man named Charles Curtis Morgan he was a father, a husband, a successful business man president of his escrow agency, but he was also a man involved in a state land fraud case which involved many crime bosses. As researched through this case I realized that the answer to this case was obvious I soon then realized that it was covered up. His case was originally as suicide I ask of how could his death be a result of suicide when there was in fact no evidence of a suicide. There was gun residue on his left hand yes, but there were also no fingerprints on the gun itself. This man stood up for what was he stood up against injustice in order to protect his family. I believe that this man should be  honored for what he tried to do, I have come to the conclusion that the people responsible for this crime was in fact Bonanno Crime Family.

This case was greatly shrouded in many rumors such as that he was involved in the very same organized crime or that he secretly worked for the U.S. government. Morgan even once claimed that "he has worked as an agent for the federal government and he fought for organized crime. He also claimed that "they" had taken his treasury identification". These reasons as well as many others would give the mafia crime family who believed that many of their activities could likely be exposed, the Bonanno Crime Family had the motives and means to silence him. However, never really said who had kidnapped as he feared for the lives of his family. It was known that the Bonannno Crime Family is in fact  the most violent and brutal mafia crime family. This  known fact can explain Mr. Morgan violent kidnapping as described by his wife he was "missing a shoe, had a plastic handcuff around his ankle, and his hand tied together with a plastic zip tie". This kind of brutality is something to expect from a crime family that is known as the most violent. One of the many crimes this family is known for is illegal narcotics, Mr. Morgan said that during his kidnapping "a hallucinogenic drug had been painted on his on his throat". He went on to claim that drug would either kill him or drive him insane, this would implement the Bonanno Crime Family as they specialize in drug class crimes. 

The crime scene held many strange factors such as "a piece of his own tooth", "a pair of sunglasses that did not belong to him", and a two dollar bills clipped to his underwear along with the same bible scripture told to his wife before he was murdered by a woman she did not know. Along with these things were "several weapons, ammunitions, and CB radio". Many of these things were mixed with others that were mostly likely planted in order to throw everyone off while also making it look like a suicide hence and/or involving the previously stated that gun residue on his left hand. Not too mention this man was shot in the back of his head with a gun that had no fingerprints on it. It's all of these factors that just don't make actually sense which brings me to this question how can someone rule a suicide when there is in fact no evidence?  Later after the murder it was reported that men searched  both his car after it was impounded and his home. The answer to that is simple mobsters like to "clear out" everything that the deceased own in order to make sure certain valuables don't fall into the wrong hands. 

In conclusion, I believe that the Bonanno Crime Family had committed the murder of Charles Morgan. Being  the person who he was the mafia crime family had both the motive and the means to have him killed. The evidence also doesn't even point to even a hint of suicide almost if ruling suicide was ruled without even evidence. Not too mention, Mr. Morgan lived in the same city the crime family operated in. This is John Henrick saying......................................................................

CASE CLOSED.